Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
ejet-logo

Articles

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Edutechnium Journal of Educational Technology

Integrating Blended Learning in Intensive English Course in Higher Education: A Theoretical and Practical Perspective

DOI
https://doi.org/10.71365/edujet.v3i2.81
Submitted
March 21, 2025
Published
2025-07-30

Abstract

This article explores the implementation of blended learning in the Intensive English Course in Higher Education. The integration of online learning through English Discoveries (ED) with offline classroom sessions aims to improve students' English proficiency by offering flexible, interactive, and learner-centered experiences. The paper is grounded in constructivist and social learning theories, offering both a theoretical foundation and practical analysis of this pedagogical approach. The study employed a qualitative descriptive method to investigate student and lecturer perspectives. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with five English instructors and ten students, classroom observations, and document analysis of course syllabi and student task records. The findings suggest that blended learning fosters greater learner autonomy, digital literacy, and language competence. Students reported increased motivation due to the accessibility and interactivity of ED, while instructors emphasized that face-to-face interaction remained vital for developing speaking skills and addressing comprehension difficulties. However, challenges such as time management difficulties, inconsistent motivation, and technological barriers (particularly unstable internet access) were also identified. The study concludes that successful blended learning implementation requires adequate institutional support, technological infrastructure, and continuous professional development for instructors.

References

  1. Anderman, Eric M and Maehr, M. L. (1994). Motivation and schooling in the middle grades. Review of Educational Research, 64(2), 287--309.
  2. Anderson, T. (2008). The theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed.). Athabasca University Press.
  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.
  4. Bashant, J. (2014). Developing Grit In Our Students: Why Grit is Such a Desirable Trait, and Practical Strategies for Teachers and Schools. Journal for Leadership and Instruction.
  5. Benson, P. (2011). Teaching and researching autonomy (2nd ed.). Pearson.
  6. Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(1), 87–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-013-9077-3
  7. Boelens, R., De Wever, B., & Voet, M. (2017). Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 22, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.06.001
  8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  9. Calo, M., et al. (2025). An intervention to build grit, resilience, and a growth mindset. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 18, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S12414741
  10. Center, R., & Williams, B. (2012). True grit: Is it important to fail? [Television broadcast]. NBC News.
  11. Chapelle, C. A. (2003). English language learning and technology: Lectures on applied linguistics in the age of information and communication technology. John Benjamins.
  12. Chen, D. L., Ertac, S., Evgeniou, T., Miao, X., & Yilmaz, E. (2024). Grit and academic resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic. npj Science of Learning, 9(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00265-3
  13. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
  14. Daniels, L. D. (2016). Grit for Kids. Independently Published.
  15. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
  16. Duckworth, A. (2016). Grit: Passion, Perseverance, and the Science of Success. Collins.
  17. Duckworth, A., Peterson, C., D. Matthews, M., & R. Kelly, D. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and Passion for Long-Term Goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087), 1087–1101.
  18. Dudeney, G., & Hockly, N. (2007). How to teach English with technology. Pearson Longman.
  19. Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
  20. English Discoveries. (2022). English Discoveries: Blended learning solutions. Retrieved from https://www.englishdiscoveries.com
  21. Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
  22. Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. Jossey-Bass.
  23. Goodwin, B., & Miller, K. (2013). Grit + talent = student success. Educational Leadership, 74–76.
  24. Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3–21). Pfeiffer.
  25. Grgurović, M. (2011). Blended learning in an ESL class: A case study. CALICO Journal, 29(1), 100–117. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.29.1.100-117
  26. Hochanadel, A., & Finamore, D. (2015). Fixed And Growth Mindset In Education And How Grit Helps Students Persist In The Face Of Adversity. Journal of International Education Research, 11(1).
  27. Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2015). Blended: Using disruptive innovation to improve schools. Jossey-Bass.
  28. Ibrahim, I. A., et al. (2025). Unveiling the impact of grit and learning agility on academic accomplishment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 117(2), 234-245. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000456
  29. Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 215–239). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  30. Kaplan, Avi and Maehr, M. L. (2007). The contributions and prospects of goal orientation theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19(2), 141--184.
  31. Kasali, R. (2018). The Great Shifting. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  32. Lamb, M., & Coleman, H. (2008). Literacy in English and the transformation of self and society in post-Suharto Indonesia. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 11(2), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.2167/beb493.0
  33. Lauder, A. (2008). The status and function of English in Indonesia: A review of the literature. Journal of English Studies, 3(4), 45–68.
  34. Levy, M., & Stockwell, G. (2006). CALL dimensions: Options and issues in computer-assisted language learning. Lawrence Erlbaum.
  35. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
  36. Lipman, J. (2013). Why tough teachers get good results. Wall Street Journal. Wall Street Journal.
  37. Little, D. (2009). Language learner autonomy and the European Language Portfolio: Two L2 English examples. Language Teaching, 42(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444808005636
  38. Lu, A. (2013). Encouraging first generation college students.
  39. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311500307
  40. Neumeier, P. (2005). A closer look at blended learning: Parameters for designing a blended learning environment for language teaching and learning. ReCALL, 17(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344005000224
  41. Nicholls, J. G. (1992). Students as educational theorists. Student Perceptions in the Classroom, 267--286.
  42. Nuraini, N. L. S., Qihua, S., Venatius, A. S., Slamet, T. I., & Cholifah, P. S. (2020). Distance Learning Strategy in COVID-19. Proceeding International Webinar Series – Educational Revolution in Post Covid Era, 2020(April 2020), 107–116.
  43. Pappano, L. (2013). ‘Grit’ and the new character education: Researchers study how certain performance traits help students learn. Education Digest, 4–9.
  44. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
  45. Piaget, J. (1976). Piaget's theory. In B. Inhelder, H. H. Chipman, & C. Zwingmann (Eds.), Piaget and his school (pp. 11–23). Springer.
  46. Picciano, A. G. (2009). Blending with purpose: The multimodal model. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(1), 7–18.
  47. Pintrich, Paul R and Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Prentice Hall.
  48. Poon, J. (2013). Blended learning: An institutional approach for enhancing students' learning experiences. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 271–288.
  49. Pramana, C., Kholis Ernawati, M. Zaini Miftah, I Putu Ayub Darmawan, & M. Zaini Miftah. (2021). Distance Learning In Primary Schools During The Covid-19 Pandemic In Indonesia: Challenges, Solutions, And Projections. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(4), 263–270. https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i4.502
  50. Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing and Health, 23(4), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G
  51. Singarimbun. (1995). Metode Penelitian Survei (Edisi revisi. Cetakan ke-2 ed.). PT Pustaka LP3ES.
  52. Sofian, Effendi and Singarimbun, M. (2012). Metode Penelitian Survei. Jakarta: LP3ES.
  53. Stracke, E. (2007). A road to understanding: A qualitative study into why learners drop out of a blended language learning (BLL) environment. ReCALL, 19(1), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344007000614
  54. Subandi, Choirudin, Mahmudi, Nizaruddin, & Hermanita. (2018). Building Interactive Communication with Google Classroom. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(2.13), 460–463.
  55. Tough, P. (2011). What if the Secret to Success Is Failure? New York Times Magazine.
  56. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  57. Warschauer, M. (2000). The changing global economy and the future of English teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 511–535. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587741