Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
ejet-logo

Articles

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Edutechnium Journal of Educational Technology

Project-Based Learning Model with Google Sites and Students' Mathematical Literacy

DOI
https://doi.org/10.71365/edujet.v2i1.43
Submitted
November 13, 2023
Published
2023-11-21

Abstract

Kemahiran dalam matematika adalah kemampuan penting yang harus diperoleh dan dikembangkan untuk mengatasi berbagai tantangan secara efektif. Masalah literasi matematika menilai kapasitas siswa untuk menganalisis, membenarkan, dan mengartikulasikan konsep secara efektif sambil memecahkan kesulitan yang dihadapi. Solusi efektif untuk mengatasi permasalahan tersebut adalah dengan menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek dengan bantuan Google Sites. Model Project Based Learning (PjBL) ini memanfaatkan kemampuan media Google Sites. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menganalisis model PJBL dengan pemanfaatan Google Sites dan menilai dampaknya terhadap kemampuan literasi matematika siswa. Penelitian ini menggunakan metodologi tinjauan literatur yang komprehensif. Pengumpulan data melibatkan pengumpulan publikasi pilihan tentang topik ini selama dekade terakhir, khususnya dari tahun 2013 hingga 2023. Artikel-artikel ini harus diakreditasi oleh Sinta 3, WOS, dan Scopus. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan tahapan pembelajaran yang berurutan untuk model PjBL pada platform Google Site. Selain itu, penelitian ini mengungkapkan adanya korelasi yang signifikan antara model PjBL dan kemampuan literasi matematika siswa. Berdasarkan temuan dan analisis, ditentukan bahwa model PjBL dapat dimanfaatkan secara efektif dengan menggunakan media Google Sites. Penggunaan paradigma PjBL yang didukung oleh Google Sites memberikan efek menguntungkan dalam meningkatkan kemampuan literasi matematika siswa. PjBL, dengan bantuan Google Sites, melibatkan siswa dalam secara aktif menyelesaikan masalah rumit dengan melakukan proyek yang memberikan hasil nyata. Esai ini akan menjelaskan lebih lanjut keuntungan model PjBL yang difasilitasi Google Sites bagi siswa.

References

  1. Ahn, S. Y. (2024). From AAA TripTik to Google: Maps as Sites of Sociotechnical Change. International Journal of Communication, 18, 738–747. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85189155808&origin=inward
  2. Anh, T. T. N. (2023). Mobile E-Portfolios on Google Sites: A Tool for Enhancing Project-Based Learning. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 17(11), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v17i11.39673.
  3. Atkinson, G. F. (1984). Process skills: Content-unrelated aspects of an analytical lab course. Journal of Chemical Education, 61(5), 413–414. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed061p413
  4. Azid, N. (2020). The effect of the successful intelligence interactive module on universiti utara malaysia students’ analytical, creative and practical thinking skills. South African Journal of Education, 40(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v40n3a1743
  5. Bae, M. (2015). Security assessment by google hacking automation tools for the web sites of Korea and the USA universities. International Journal of Security and Its Applications, 9(5), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijsia.2015.9.5.17
  6. Bahrudin, I. (2013). Application of google maps API with grails services for mapping highway construction sites. Advanced Materials Research, 671, 3185–3188. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.671-674.3185
  7. Ballard, T. (2012). Google This!: Putting Google and other social media sites to work for your library. Google This!: Putting Google and Other Social Media Sites to Work for Your Library, 1–189. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781780633176
  8. Bolstad, O. H. (2019). Teaching for mathematical literacy: School leaders’ and teachers’ rationales. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(3), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9537
  9. Bos, D. (2022). Using virtual reality (VR) for teaching and learning in geography: fieldwork, analytical skills, and employability. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 46(3), 479–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2021.1901867
  10. Casley, S. (2014). Choosing and using Google Sites for ePortfolios at EIT. Proceedings of ASCILITE 2014 - Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Tertiary Education, 490–494. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84955259528&origin=inward
  11. Chu, S. (2011). Using google sites in collaborative inquiry project-based learning. Connecting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning to Policy and Practice: CSCL 2011 Conf. Proc. - Community Events Proceedings, 9th International Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conf., 1148–1149. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84858400166&origin=inward
  12. Colwell, J. (2016). When I hear literacy: Using pre-service teachers’ perceptions of mathematical literacy to inform program changes in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 53, 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.11.001
  13. Dendir, S. (2019). Do economics courses improve students’ analytical skills? A Difference-in-Difference estimation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 165, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2019.07.004
  14. Dervisoglu, A. (2021). Analysis of the temporal changes of inland ramsar sites in turkey using google earth engine. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10080521
  15. Ekawati, R. (2020). Primary Students’ Mathematical Literacy: A Case Study. Infinity Journal, 9(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v9i1.p49-58
  16. Eskritt, M. (2006). Analytical reasoning skills: Improving performance with notations. Canadian Journal of Education, 29(3), 855–872. https://doi.org/10.2307/20054199
  17. Farida, F. (2023). Assessment in Educational Context: The Case of Environmental Literacy, Digital Literacy, and its Relation to Mathematical Thinking Skill. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 23(76). https://doi.org/10.6018/red.552231
  18. Hasan, L. (2009). Using google analytics to evaluate the usability of e-commerce sites. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 5619, 697–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02806-9_81
  19. Hillman, A. M. (2014). A literature review on disciplinary literacy: How do secondary teachers apprentice students into mathematical literacy? Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 57(5), 397–406. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.256
  20. Höfer, T. (2009). Supporting mathematical literacy: Examples from a cross-curricular project. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41(1), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0117-9
  21. Holenstein, M. (2021). Transfer effects of mathematical literacy: an integrative longitudinal study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36(3), 799–825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00491-4
  22. Jablonka, E. (2015). The evolvement of numeracy and mathematical literacy curricula and the construction of hierarchies of numerate or mathematically literate subjects. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 47(4), 599–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0691-6
  23. Jensen, K. (2013). Managing Library Electronic Resources Using Google Sites. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 25(2), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/1941126X.2013.785289
  24. Jeyarajaguru, K. S. (2023). Effective Creation and Usage Of Simplified Virtual Curation Lab Using Google Sites: Implementation For Principles Of Biochemistry Laboratory Course. Journal of Educators Online, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2023.20.1.6
  25. Kaiser, G. (2005). Development of mathematical literacy: Results of an empirical study. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 24(2), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hri016
  26. Kilpatrick, J. (2001). Understanding mathematical literacy: The contribution of research. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017973827514
  27. Kucera, C. (2022). Teaching Online Physical Education During Social Distancing Using Google Sites: Pedagogy, Strategies, Reflections and Barriers of a Teacher. Movimento, 28. https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-8918.122688
  28. Lemley, C. (2014). Google sites and oral history projects: Connecting school to community. Media Rich Instruction: Connecting Curriculum to All Learners, 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00152-4_16
  29. Liline, S. (2024). The Effect of the Pjb-HOTS learning model on cognitive learning, analytical thinking skills, creative thinking skills, and metacognitive skills of biology education students. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 21(1), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2024.010
  30. Liou, Y. (2011). Using Google Sites to Communicate with Parents: A Case Study. Language Testing in Asia, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1186/2229-0443-1-2-68
  31. Lutzer, C. (2005). Fostering mathematical literacy. PRIMUS, 15(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970508984101
  32. Machaba, F. M. (2018). Pedagogical demands in mathematics and mathematical literacy: A case of mathematics and mathematical literacy teachers and facilitators. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/78243
  33. Marini, A. (2023). Development of Web Using Google Sites to Increase Learning Interest in Social Science Education. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2023(106), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2023.106.009
  34. Matteson, S. M. (2006). Mathematical literacy and standardized mathematical assessments. Reading Psychology, 27(2), 205–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710600642491
  35. Mogi, Y. (2017). Social Networking Sites for Peer-Driven Health Communication: Diabetes-Related Communities in Google+. Diabetology International, 8(3), 323–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13340-017-0311-5
  36. Neuhaus, C. (2008). Google Scholar Goes to School: The Presence of Google Scholar on College and University Web Sites. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2007.11.009
  37. Nguyen, H. T. T. (2022). Critical Reflection and Learning Motivation in a Smart Education Environment: A Study through a Google Sites-Based Project (GBP). International Journal of Technologies in Learning, 29(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0144/CGP/v29i01/95-108
  38. Nkonki, V. (2023). Student Perspectives on WhatsApp Support for Developing School Experience e-Portfolios on Google Sites. Proceedings of the European Conference on E-Learning, ECEL, 2023, 219–225. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85179135170&origin=inward
  39. Novita, R. (2021). Digital technology in learning mathematical literacy, can it helpful? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1776(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1776/1/012027
  40. Ortega, J. (2017). Toward a homogenization of academic social sites: A longitudinal study of profiles in Academia.edu, Google Scholar Citations and ResearchGate. Online Information Review, 41(6), 812–825. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-01-2016-0012
  41. Pally, M. (2001). Skills development in ‘sustained’ content-based curricula: Case studies in analytical/critical thinking and academic writing. Language and Education, 15(4), 278–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780108666814
  42. Papatla, P. (2009). Google or BizRate? How search engines and comparison sites affect unplanned choices of online retailers. Journal of Business Research, 62(11), 1039–1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.10.018
  43. Reskiyati. (2023). Development of Google Sites Assisted Learning Media on Vibration, Waves and Sound Material. E3S Web of Conferences, 400. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340001017
  44. Romero, R. (2020). Poetic Transcription in the Sociology Classroom: Developing Empathy, Analytical Skills, Creativity, and Engagement. Teaching Sociology, 48(3), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X20923703
  45. Roodt, S. (2012). Using google sites© as an innovative learning tool at undergraduate level in higher education. ECIS 2012 - Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Information Systems. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84905748630&origin=inward
  46. Siregar, H. L. (2020). Application of project based learning (PJBL) inislamic religious education courses (an alternative solution to the problem of learning PAI at PTU). Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.22159/jcr.07.01.05
  47. Slaughter, D. S. (1989). Improving physical therapy students’ clinical problem-solving skills: An analytical questioning model. Physical Therapy, 69(6), 441–447. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/69.6.441
  48. Solomon, Y. (2008). Mathematical Literacy: Developing Identities of Inclusion. Mathematical Literacy: Developing Identities of Inclusion, 1–239. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203889275
  49. Sosa, I. A. (2023). Google Sites: An Effective and Accessible Solution to Improve the Teaching of Mathematics in Virtual Environments. ECTM 2023 - 2023 IEEE 7th Ecuador Technical Chapters Meeting. https://doi.org/10.1109/ETCM58927.2023.10309017
  50. Stacey, K. (2015). Assessing mathematical literacy: The PISA experience. Assessing Mathematical Literacy: The PISA Experience, 1–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10121-7
  51. Steen, L. A. (2007). Developing Mathematical Literacy. New ICMI Study Series, 10, 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-29822-1_30
  52. Sternberg, R. (2005). Augmenting the SAT through assessments of analytical, practical, and creative skills. Choosing Students: Higher Education Admissions Tools for the 21st Century, 159–176. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410612533
  53. Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The Rainbow Project: Enhancing the SAT through assessments of analytical, practical, and creative skills. Intelligence, 34(4), 321–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2006.01.002
  54. Strangeways, I. (2009). Using Google Earth to evaluate GCOS weather station sites. Weather, 64(1), 4–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/wea.334
  55. Suryati, I. (2023). Development of Google Sites-based blended learning media on linier program material mathematics subjects. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2727. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0141439
  56. Tavares, N. (2012). Experimenting with english collaborative writing on google sites. CSEDU 2012 - Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, 1, 217–222. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84864871743&origin=inward
  57. Thelwall, M. (2002). Research note: In praise of Google - Finding law journal Web sites. Online Information Review, 26(4), 271–272. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520210438732
  58. Tseng, K. H. (2013a). Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning (PjBL) environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9160-x
  59. Tseng, K. H. (2013b). Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning (PjBL) environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9160-x
  60. Tso, T. Y. (2018). Design and development of mathematical literacy-oriented subject materials. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 63(4), 29–58. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0002
  61. Wang, J. (2013). Google sites. Technical Services Quarterly, 30(3), 340–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2013.788375
  62. Wang, P. Y. (2012). A duplication software for cloud-based web site: An example of Google sites. Proceedings - 2012 4th International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Communication Systems and Networks, CICSyN 2012, 149–152. https://doi.org/10.1109/CICSyN.2012.36
  63. Wani, S. A. (2024). Developing critical thinking skills: Encouraging analytical and creative thinking. Transforming Education for Personalized Learning, 114–130. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-0868-4.ch007
  64. Wardana, G. K. (2024). Development of Google Sites learning media based on problem based-learning. AIP Conference Proceedings, 3145(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0214251
  65. Webb, G. K. (2019). Factors Related to Larger but Fewer Wildfires and Fewer Deer in California: A Google Sites Knowledge Base. Issues in Information Systems, 20(1), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.48009/1_iis_2019_22-31
  66. Wijaya, A. (2016). Students’ information literacy: A perspective from mathematical literacy. Journal on Mathematics Education, 7(2), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.22342/jome.v7i2.3532
  67. Yeh, E. (2014). Enhancing linguistic and intercultural competencies through the use of social network sites and google earth. Promoting Global Literacy Skills through Technology-Infused Teaching and Learning, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6347-3.ch001
  68. Yildirim, M. M. (2020). Mathematical and financial literacy: A research with prizren University students. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(6), 1574–1586. https://doi.org/10.18844/CJES.V15I6.5318